Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdventureQuest Worlds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Marasmusine (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AdventureQuest Worlds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating for deletion because the WP:reliability of the sites mmorpg.com and mmohut.com, which reviewed this game, has been called into question at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artix Entertainment (4th nomination). Pcap ping 16:07, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 16:09, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 16:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Nifboy (talk) 18:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Let this page stay. Where else are we going to submit the story arcs for this game. Rtkat3 (talk) 5:39, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Comment - A ton of press releases. Anything else? Extremely brief mention here. SharkD Talk 04:36, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:38, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- no reliable, independent sources which are required to demonstrate why this is notable. Reyk _YO! 00:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this should be pretty obvious. Does WP:GAMECRUFT link anywhere useful nowadays? User:Krator (t c) 01:41, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No independent sources to support the notability; just another in the Artix Entertainment walled garden.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.